A new study has refute a celebrated Freudian idea that successful people are doomed to sadness by proving that people in highly successful careers are ashappyor happier than others , amongst other findings . Despite Freud ’s estimate , it seems that while some can sure as shooting lose from increase insistence and success , the middling person may be significantly better off for it .
Sigmund Freud , despite being the founder of psychoanalysis , was bang for some seriously strange ideas ( you know , the whole fancying your own female parent / father thing ) . So it ’s no surprise that mountain of people revel in proving him ill-timed . One of Freud ’s most prominent idea was the notion that one can be “ wrecked by success ” : successful mass are often distressed as a result , he theorized , giving examples of a human race who urgently tried to fill his mentor ’s shoes , only to flow into depression and mental illness .
Freud was n’t the only one to notice this perceived phenomenon , with Steven Berglas famously publishing his book “ The Success Syndrome ” , explaining how citizenry “ reach the bottom when they reach the top ” . This was the fullest characterization of Freud ’s idea , focalize on how hoi polloi at the top of their career often fall into self - destructive tendencies or genial malady as a result of the rewards of their succeeder .
It ’s easy to sympathize why this theme gained so much traction – celebrities becoming dupe to meat abuse seemed almost inevitable not too long ago , and people carry lowering burdens in concern often described the battle that come with it . However , the new research suggests this may have just been the display case for a vocal nonage .
To investigate , investigator require three cohorts of 1,826 gamy - potential intellectuals and compared those in surpassing careers with those in more typical careers . Psychological well - being and general metrics of happiness were taken , as well as metrics of health .
Across all cohorts , those in highly successful careers were as happy and healthy ( or more so ) liken to their peers . In a second bailiwick that film masses in extremely - stressful , elite STEM field and compared them to match , they found that career did not bear on participant ' interpersonal relationship or psychological well - being , and they were often really good off .
“ Both studies find out that exceptionally successful careers were not associated with aesculapian infirmity , psychological maladjustment , and compromise interpersonal and family relationships ; if anything , overall , the great unwashed with exceptionally successful careers were medically and psychologically better off , ” the authors publish .
The results suggest that Freud was incorrect and the diametrical may actually be true – success may breed more happiness than a distinctive vocation . There were interesting differences in the home that successful the great unwashed had compared to their peers : successful men had more youngster , were married more often , and divorce less ; while successful women had few baby compared to their peer .
The sketch was published inPerspectives on Psychological Science .